9

Country Case Studies

Case studies that focus on the overall cross-sector infrastructure sharing experiences in 3 countries

This section sets out three case studies that focus on the overall cross-sector infrastructure sharing experiences in three countries: Lithuania, South Africa and the United States.

1. Lithuania. Lithuania’s infrastructure sharing is credited with contributing to the high level of fiber deployment in the country. However, most infrastructure sharing still remains within the telecommunications sector and cross-sector infrastructure sharing has been limited.

2. South Africa. South Africa’s case summarizes the current telecommunications market and describes the regulatory and policy approach of the government. It highlights three business models used to leverage shared infrastructure.

3. United States. United States’ case traces the development of cross-sector infrastructure sharing practices and policies and provides examples. This case provides valuable and nuanced insights for policymakers, regulators and other stakeholders elsewhere in the world who are today focused on ways to increase the incidence of infrastructure sharing to support the development of broadband.

 


 

References and Resources:

1. Gelvanovska, Natalija et al, Broadband Networks in the Middle East and North Africa, 2014

2. European Commission, Implementation of the EU Regulatory Framework for Electronic Communication, 2015

3. Republic of Lithuania, Communications Regulatory Authority, RRT Annual Report 2014, 2014

4. Deloitte, APC, Unlocking Broadband For All. Broadband Infrastructure Sharing Policies and Strategies in Emerging Markets, Policies and Strategies Report, New York, 2015 https://www.apc.org/en/pubs/unlocking-broadband-all-broadband-infrastructure-s. (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

5. Broadband Infraco, Annual report 2008, Annual Report, Sandton, 2008

6. Van Zyl, Gareth, “Vodacom-Neotel deal should worry Telkom – analyst,” Fin24tech, July 1, 2015, http://www.fin24.com/Tech/Companies/Vodacom-Neotel-deal-should-worry-Telkom-analyst-20150701 (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

7. Johnson, Andrew, Brief overview and assessment of the South African ICT state-owned enterprises, AfDB, 2013

8. DFA Open Access Network, Home, http://www.dfafrica.co.za (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

9. BMI-T 2014, “Update on fibre deployments in South Africa & drivers & inhibitors,” Presented at the FTTH Conference 2014, Johannesburg 28-29 October 2014.

10. Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005 (South Africa), http://www.mangaung.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Electronic-Communications-Act.pdf (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

11. Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, “Electronic Communications Facilities Leasing Regulations” No.R.468, May 31, 2010, http://thornton.co.za/resources/gg33252_nn468_pg3-15.pdf (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

12. Republic of South Africa, “South Africa’s National Broadband Policy (Government Notice No. 953 of 2013)” Government Gazette 582 (December, 2013):1-64, http://www.greengazette.co.za/pages/national-gazette-37119-of-06-december-2013-vol-582_20131206-GGN-37119-003 (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

13. South African Government, National Development Plan of 2030, http://www.gov.za/issues/national-development-plan-2030 (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

14. Republic of South Africa, Government Gazette 603 (September, 2015):1-24, http://www.gpwonline.co.za/Gazettes/Gazettes/39208_15-9_ICASA.pdf (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

15. FTTH Council, FibreCo Telecommunications, The FibreCo difference, undated, http://fibreco.co.za/About/The-FibreCo-Difference.html (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

16. Tom Standage, The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of The Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s On-Line Pioneers, New York: Bloomsbury USA, 1988

17. United States Congress, Act of 1 July 1862 (Pacific Railway Act) at §19, 12 Stat. 489, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/299953?q=*:* (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

18. Maury Klein, The Genesis of Industrial America, 1870-1920 at 77 (New York: Cambridge University Press 2007)

19. IEEE Standards Association, Celebrating 100 Years of Safety and Interoperability: National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), 2016, http://standards.ieee.org/about/nesc/100/ (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

20. US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Telecommunications Handbook for Transportation Professionals: The Basics of Telecommunications, Ch. 8, Construction, https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/telecomm_handbook/chapter8.htm (last visited 13 Feb 2017)

21. Cascade Corporation v. Sprint Communications, No. 2:11-cv-125-JAW, Court’s Report of Telephone Conference. (US Dist. Ct. Maine 2012) http://www.med.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Torresen/2012/NT_02152012_2_11cv125_Cascade_v_Sprint.pdf (last visited 11 Feb 2017)

22. Union Pacific, Southern Pacific Railroad, https://www.up.com/aboutup/special_trains/heritage/southern_pacific/index.htm (last visited 11 Feb 2017)